Google Affirms There’s No SEO Benefit to Dedicated Hosting

Google Affirms There’s No SEO Benefit to Dedicated Hosting

Google’s spokesperson John Mueller affirms there’s no SEO advantage associated with hosting a website on a dedicated server instead of a shared server.

Ask Googlebot banner

The statement comes from the latest installment of the Ask Googlebot series on YouTube. Mueller answers the question of a small business owner, trying to keep operational costs down.


Essentially, all entities with limited resources come upon this decision, choosing between shared hosting and a dedicated server.

Hosting a site on a small budget can become a massive concern for many entities. However, web hosting providers have enhanced their services over time and now offer top-quality packages at affordable prices.

Shared hosting is the cheaper alternative, as it refers to a setup where multiple sites use the same IP address or the same server.

On the other side of the spectrum, dedicated hosting assigns an IP address to a single user. People usually relate dedicated servers with faster page speeds. Thus, they believe this hosting results in a ranking advantage in Google’s search results.

However, you cannot tell whether a website is hosted on a single server or multiple data centers from the outside.

John Mueller, who serves the role of a Webmaster Trends Analyst at Google, had his to say:

Using shared hosting is perfectly fine and does not negatively affect your site in Google Search.

Still, Mueller further explained that shared hosting users should watch out for overloading servers with too many websites. Hosting too many sites slows down the server, whether it’s a dedicated or a shared one. However, the chances are higher for the latter to occur.

A slow server eventually leads to a poor user experience. This, in turn, harms SEO rankings, as it makes it more challenging for Google to crawl.

In other words, shared hosting is not slower by default, nor dedicated hosting guarantee better SEO ranking. However, dedicated servers are usually associated with faster speeds, which indirectly affect the process.

There’s no one-solution-fits-all, and a quality shared hosting can even outperform an inferior dedicated server.

A Free, Human-Built Website — Included with Every Hosting Plan

Sign up for any annual  hosting plan and get a custom-built, 4-page WordPress site. Yes, an actual web designer will create a professional, m...
8 min read
Walter Akolo
Walter Akolo
Hosting Expert

DreamHost in Europe: Local Hosting, Faster Servers, and Smarter Tools

now runs in Europe (Amsterdam). Until now, DreamHost’s infrastructure was anchored in Ashburn, Virginia, and Hillsboro, Oregon. The addition o...
6 min read
Walter Akolo
Walter Akolo
Hosting Expert

FastComet Simplifies Magento 2.4 Search with Built-In Elasticsearch Integration

If you're running or planning to upgrade to Magento 2.4, you’ll need Elasticsearch. It’s a mandatory requirement. Magento 2.4 won’t install or upg...
3 min read
Walter Akolo
Walter Akolo
Hosting Expert

FastComet Launches a Marketplace with Cloud Apps and Hosting Add-Ons

FastComet has introduced a major upgrade to its hosting experience with the launch of the —a centralized hub where you can install cloud apps, enable add-ons, and access new services in just a few clicks. Instead of navigating different parts of your dashboard or relying on emails to find out what’s new, the Marketplace brings […]
6 min read
Walter Akolo
Walter Akolo
Hosting Expert
Click to go to the top of the page
Go To Top
HostAdvice.com provides professional web hosting reviews fully independent of any other entity. Our reviews are unbiased, honest, and apply the same evaluation standards to all those reviewed. While monetary compensation is received from a few of the companies listed on this site, compensation of services and products have no influence on the direction or conclusions of our reviews. Nor does the compensation influence our rankings for certain host companies. This compensation covers account purchasing costs, testing costs and royalties paid to reviewers.